Episode 36- Do we have to correct hyperglycemia in the ER?


 

Episode Summary:

Is routine correction of hyperglycemia in the ER necessary? And if so, which agents and routes are recommended? Find out this week!

Show Notes:

Key Points:

Do we have to correct hyperglycemia in the ER?”:
– In a retrospective review of 422 adult patients who had a glucose level of 400 mg/dL or greater (mean 491 mg/dL) during their ER stay, there was no association between discharge glucose levels and either repeat visit for hyperglycemia or hospitalization, or the development of DKA and HHS. Actually, 2% of patients developed hypoglycemia due to the interventions
– If the team wants to lower glucose levels prior to discharge, use the patient’s own sliding scale if they are on insulin at home or use your institution’s sliding scale for hospitalized patients to get an estimated dose
– Another option is to use nursing-driven tools validated in the ER setting, such as the the Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI) protocol (see image below)
– When choosing which insulin to give, stick to rapid-acting insulins such as aspart and lispro, and stick to the SQ route. IV regular insulin should be reserved for diabetic emergencies (DKA/ HHS) or shifting of hyperkalemia. Regular insulin has a pharmacokinetic profile that is not ideal for ER patients (peak at 3 hours with a 6-8 hour duration) vs rapid-acting insulins (peak at 1 hour with a 3 hour duration)
ER-Rx Episode 36

Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI) protocol. This nurse-driven protocol attempted to lower the glucose level to a goal of < 180 mg/dL. After the nurse asked the patient when they last took their insulin or oral diabetes agents, they calculated a weight-based dose of SQ insulin based on the patient’s glucose level. They would then recheck glucose every 2 hours and continue to follow the protocol. By using this protocol, they were able to lower glucose by 175 mg/dL and lower the mean hospital LOS by 1.5 days compared to historical controls (P < 0.05); however, mean LOS in the ER was not affected. Keep in mind that this protocol came with a 7% risk of hypoglycemia.

References:

Driver BE, Olives TD, Bischof, JE, et al. Discharge glucose is not associated with short-term adverse outcomes in emergency department patients with moderate to severe hyperglycemia. Ann Emerg Med. 2016; 68 (6): 697- 705

Munoz C, Villanueva G, Fogg L, et al. Impact of a subcutaneous insulin protocol in the emergency department: rush emergency department hyperglycemia intervention (REDHI). J of Emerg Med. 2008; 40 (5): 493-498.

Koscal LJ, Weeda ER, Matuskowitz AJ, Weant KA. Intravenous insulin for the management of non-emergent hyperglycemia in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2020

Transcript:

Hello and welcome to Episode 36 of ER-Rx. Today, we’re going to talk a little bit about glucose levels and the need to aggressively lower them in patients who are not in diabetic emergencies. We’ll also look at a potential tool that can help you decide what dose of insulin to give, and we’ll wrap up by talking about SQ versus IV administration of insulin and some pharmacokinetic data.

We’ve all seen the patient in the ER who happens to have elevated glucose levels. Now obviously if the patient is in a diabetic emergency such as DKA or HHS, we treat these patients with fluids and usually a continuous infusion of IV regular insulin.

We know that in the inpatient setting, glucose control (with goals usually around < 180 mg/dL) has been associated with better outcomes. But what about a patient who is in your ER with moderate hyperglycemia or a completely non-related concern whom you plan to discharge? Should we aggressively correct their glucose to a specific value? Does it have any bearing on their bounce-back rate?

Back in 2016, a study was published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine to answer this question. They did a retrospective review of adult patients who had a glucose level of 400 mg/dL or greater during their ER stay, and excluded patients who were admitted to the hospital or had type 1 diabetes. They ended up with 566 ER encounters in 422 patients, 58% were men and the mean age was 47 years. The mean arrival glucose level was 491 mg/dL. In 341 encounters, or 60% of cases, both IV fluids and SQ insulin was given to reduce glucose levels. Mean glucose reductions were 157 mg/dL and mean glucose values at discharge were 334 mg/dL (with a range of 48 – 694 mg/dL).

The authors looked at a 7-day follow-up period and found the following. Outcomes for return ER visits for hyperglycemia and hospitalization occurred in 13% and 7% of patients, respectively. DKA occurred in only 2 patients, and 0 patients developed HHS or died. All in all, there was no association between discharge glucose levels and either repeat visit for hyperglycemia or hospitalization, or the development of DKA and HHS. Actually, 2% of patients developed hypoglycemia due to the interventions. The authors concluded that “attaining a specific glucose level level before discharge in patients with hyperglycemia may be less important than traditionally thought.”

But what if your patient is being admitted, or if they have type I DM, which were exclusion criteria in the previous study? Or, what if you just really want to lower those levels prior to discharge or if you are still unsure about patient disposition?

Your go-to answer should be a rapid-acting, SQ insulin such as lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog). To get to a dose of SQ insulin, if your patient is on insulin at home, just ask them how many units of insulin they would give themselves with that particular glucose value. If the patient is not on insulin at home, you have a couple of options. One option is to use your institutions sliding-scale insulin protocol to determine what the nurses on the floor would give your patient with that specific glucose value. Or, we can use some well-developed SQ insulin protocols that are specific to the ER setting, like the Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI) protocol. And although this protocol attempted to lower the glucose level to a certain goal, of < 180 mg/dL in this case, and we just learned that this is probably unnecessary, its still worthwhile looking into this protocol. This is a nurse-driven protocol that would trigger if glucose levels were > 200 mg/dL. After the nurse asked the patient when they last took their insulin or oral diabetes agents, they calculated a weight-based dose of SQ insulin based on the patient’s glucose level. They would then recheck glucose every 2 hours and continue to follow the protocol. I’ll post this protocol to the errxpodcast Instagram page and to errxpodcast.com. By using this protocol, they were able to lower glucose by 175 mg/dL and lower the mean hospital LOS by 1.5 days compared to historical controls (P < 0.05); however, mean LOS in the ER was not affected. Keep in mind that this protocol came with a 7% risk of hypoglycemia.

Notice that I did not mention SQ or IV regular insulin as treatment options. At my institution, we try to avoid IV insulins outside of the setting of DKA/HHS or shifting of hyperkalemia. There really is no need to use IV insulin when we can use the SQ route. If you remember the pharmacokinetic data of insulins, regular insulins peak at about 3 hours and can have a 6-8 hour duration of action. Rapid-acting insulins peak within 1 hour with a duration of about 3 hours- which is a much better profile for the typical ER patient’s duration of stay. Not only can we cause hypoglycemia with IV insulins remember that giving IV insulin also lowers potassium levels; a recent study out of the ER setting found that patients given > 5 units IV regular insulin had an 8% risk of hypokalemia- which is just another small reason to not use the IV route routinely.

In conclusion, remember that for patients discharging from your ER, there is probably no need to normalize their hyperglycemia unless they are in a diabetic emergency. The most important intervention you can make is to make sure the patient has proper out-patient follow-up and adequate supplies of medications. If you still aren’t convinced, consider using SQ, rapid-acting insulins instead of IV or SQ regular insulin to try to lower those glucose levels. Using the patient’s own sliding-scale algorithm, using your institutions algorithm for hospitalized patients, or using ER-specific protocols such as the REDHI are good places to start.

As always, thank you so much for your time. Please remember to sing up for our newsletter on errxpodcast.com.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Reviews/ Comments

“Love this podcast for anyone working in an ER or ICU. If you aren’t a pharmacist you will still get tons of useful information to improve your practice. Adis has a knack for finding a happy balance between explaining the pharmacokinetics and practical use for patients at the bedside. Highly recommend!”

–  NotAPharmacist, Apple Podcasts review 

“Perfect amount of knowledge in a great length to refresh ICU and ED topics. Explains concepts in an easy to understand fashion”

–  RxLaura, Apple Podcasts review

“I love listening to this podcast because I can listen to 1 or 2 on my way to work and it provides great info! As a paramedic, this podcast has really helped me understand the “why” we give certain meds.”

cresjr, Apple Podcasts review

“Ideal podcast to listen on the way to my shift. Learning points throughout!”

andmatjos, Apple Podcasts review

“I’m currently in my last year of pharmacy school […] I just happen to come across your podcast on YouTube as I was trying to find a good explanation regarding the misleading sulfa allergy in non-antibiotic sulfonamides. Your explanation was great. I can’t believe I’m only now finding out about your podcasts but please continue to make them for as long as you can. Prospective pharmacists, such as myself, really appreciate you taking the time to put such great educational content out there.”

– S.P., Pharmacy Student

“Adis does a wonderful job of gathering the evidence-based answers to the hard questions that we all get as pharmacists and putting them into a nice, neat package.”

– rebroush1, Apple Podcasts review

“This is a great podcast to listen to at work and is not too overwhelming and well put together. Highly recommended for anyone in healthcare, even outside of emergency medicine.”

Peelage, Apple Podcasts review

“Great reviews on drug-related topics with useful details on drug mechanisms, pharmacodynamics and administration considerations as well as data to support recommendations. Great for pharmacists, providers and learners!”

-JaayyZzee, Apple Podcasts review

“I found the topics very helpful. I have been recommending this show to pharmacy students and residents, who are also enjoying it.”

hvgjnfd, Apple Podcasts review

“As a PA, I found this very informative. I like that the episodes are short, making them easy to listen to on my way to and from work. Would love to hear more pediatric topics!”

-Pediatric PA, Apple Podcasts review

“Good podcast thats very informative for all healthcare providers. Very easy to listen to and enjoy.”

-Bradlley88, Apple Podcasts review